Pakistani vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pakistani
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pakistanis

Iroquois

Good
Fair
8,084
SOCIAL INDEX
78.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
88th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Pakistani Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,154,235 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Pakistani communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pakistanis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pakistanis corresponds to an increase of 57.0 Iroquois.
Pakistani Integration in Iroquois Communities

Pakistani vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,317 compared to $87,255, a difference of 20.7%), median household income ($89,638 compared to $74,279, a difference of 20.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,844 compared to $53,737, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 3.9%), median female earnings ($40,596 compared to $36,408, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,325 compared to $47,380, a difference of 12.6%).
Pakistani vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricPakistaniIroquois
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,587
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,390
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,638
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,254
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,719
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,596
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,325
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,401
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,317
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,844
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.1%
Excellent
25.1%

Pakistani vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 37.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 34.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 15.7%).
Pakistani vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricPakistaniIroquois
Poverty
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.2%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.5%

Pakistani vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
Pakistani vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPakistaniIroquois
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%

Pakistani vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Pakistani vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPakistaniIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.6%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.7%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Tragic
80.6%

Pakistani vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 25.3%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.9%), family households (64.7% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and currently married (47.2% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 5.5%).
Pakistani vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPakistaniIroquois
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Good
47.2%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
38.2%

Pakistani vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 22.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 8.2%).
Pakistani vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPakistaniIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Good
6.5%

Pakistani vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.2%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.3%), and master's degree (15.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
Pakistani vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricPakistaniIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Fair
97.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.4%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.5%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
48.1%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.7%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.6%

Pakistani vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 29.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 26.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 9.5%).
Pakistani vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricPakistaniIroquois
Disability
Average
11.7%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Excellent
12.0%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.2%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%