Blackfeet vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,897,916 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 26.3 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,695 compared to $39,104, a difference of 3.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,531 compared to $83,682, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $47,380, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,029 compared to $53,737, a difference of 0.54%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.63%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,595 compared to $87,255, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.0%), single male poverty (15.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and male poverty (14.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (20.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.14%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.84%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.4%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.8% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 0.070%), births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 0.75%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 14.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.4%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.65%).