Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,495,920 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Eastern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Africa corresponds to an increase of 4.2 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,157 compared to $53,737, a difference of 13.8%), median household income ($84,299 compared to $74,279, a difference of 13.5%), and median family income ($102,451 compared to $90,543, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,158 compared to $47,380, a difference of 8.0%), median male earnings ($53,713 compared to $49,374, a difference of 8.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,458 compared to $83,682, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 28.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and single father poverty (14.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 23.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.2% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (61.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.8%), no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.1%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 30.1%), and no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.9% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.28%), high school diploma (88.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 32.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 8.6%).