Native Hawaiian vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Native Hawaiian
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Native Hawaiians
Iroquois
6,131
SOCIAL INDEX
58.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
162nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Native Hawaiian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,742,316 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.240. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 7.3 Iroquois.
Native Hawaiian vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $53,737, a difference of 32.2%), median household income ($89,919 compared to $74,279, a difference of 21.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $87,255, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 1.4%), per capita income ($41,017 compared to $39,104, a difference of 4.9%), and median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $36,408, a difference of 5.6%).
Income Metric | Native Hawaiian | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,017 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,910 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,919 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,027 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,306 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,461 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,158 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,058 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $105,149 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $71,021 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.4% | Excellent 25.1% |
Native Hawaiian vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 39.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 36.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.7%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 14.8%).
Poverty Metric | Native Hawaiian | Iroquois |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.9% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.4% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Native Hawaiian vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.65%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Native Hawaiian | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.3% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Native Hawaiian vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Native Hawaiian | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 80.6% |
Native Hawaiian vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.8%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.3%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 7.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Native Hawaiian | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.4% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.1% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.43 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.3% | Tragic 38.2% |
Native Hawaiian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 45.2%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 42.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 28.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Native Hawaiian | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.4% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 24.9% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Good 6.5% |
Native Hawaiian vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.0%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (96.9% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%).
Education Level Metric | Native Hawaiian | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.5% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 63.9% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.6% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.1% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.6% |
Native Hawaiian vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 31.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.21%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.3%).
Disability Metric | Native Hawaiian | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.1% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.3% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |