Canadian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 188,307,742 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.154% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 154.0 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $87,255, a difference of 19.8%), median household income ($87,769 compared to $74,279, a difference of 18.2%), and median family income ($106,597 compared to $90,543, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $36,408, a difference of 9.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $47,380, a difference of 10.5%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 31.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 31.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.8%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.8%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 19.6%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.68%), family households (64.4% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 31.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 26.5%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 24.7%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 22.6%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 6.0%).