Taiwanese vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Taiwanese
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Taiwanese
Iroquois
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Taiwanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,159,693 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.564. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.153% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 153.2 Iroquois.
Taiwanese vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $83,682, a difference of 21.3%), median household income ($89,900 compared to $74,279, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,180 compared to $87,255, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.27%), householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $47,380, a difference of 5.1%), and median female earnings ($40,576 compared to $36,408, a difference of 11.5%).
Income Metric | Taiwanese | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,455 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $107,295 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,900 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,902 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,556 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,576 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,804 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $101,492 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,180 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,894 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Excellent 25.1% |
Taiwanese vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 51.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 48.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 11.5%).
Poverty Metric | Taiwanese | Iroquois |
Poverty | Good 12.2% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.5% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Taiwanese vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 43.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 42.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Taiwanese | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Taiwanese vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Taiwanese | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.8% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 80.6% |
Taiwanese vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 31.8%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.9%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (45.8% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Taiwanese | Iroquois |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.8% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.0% | Tragic 38.2% |
Taiwanese vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.6%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.87%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Taiwanese | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.7% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.4% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.9% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.0% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Good 6.5% |
Taiwanese vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.7%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.3%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.63%).
Education Level Metric | Taiwanese | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.5% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.3% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 66.4% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.7% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.7% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.0% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Taiwanese vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 45.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 40.0%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.59%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 10.5%).
Disability Metric | Taiwanese | Iroquois |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |