Immigrants from Belgium vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,239,067 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Belgium communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.629. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belgium within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belgium corresponds to an increase of 28.2 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,082 compared to $39,104, a difference of 40.9%), median family income ($123,831 compared to $90,543, a difference of 36.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,932 compared to $87,255, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,830 compared to $47,380, a difference of 15.7%), wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and median female earnings ($44,587 compared to $36,408, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 44.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 42.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 13.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 36.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.1%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.14%), family households (63.0% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.2%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.61%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 88.1%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 81.0%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.12%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 46.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 32.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.9%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.3%).