Asian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,427,975 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($101,681 compared to $74,279, a difference of 36.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $87,255, a difference of 35.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $83,682, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 7.4%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $47,380, a difference of 20.3%), and median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $36,408, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 57.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 53.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 14.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 30.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 42.6%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.8%), family households (66.5% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 22.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 52.1%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 49.1%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.25%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.4% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 52.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 43.3%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.2%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.6%).