Immigrants from Africa vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,929,123 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to an increase of 2.0 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,289 compared to $74,279, a difference of 12.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,284 compared to $87,255, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,837 compared to $53,737, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,609 compared to $47,380, a difference of 6.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,372 compared to $83,682, a difference of 8.0%), and wage/income gap (23.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 24.2%), single female poverty (21.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 19.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.98%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 15.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.22%), currently married (43.9% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.8%), no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.7%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 23.4%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.50%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 35.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.1%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 7.3%).