Navajo vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,848,379 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 15.4 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $39,104, a difference of 34.7%), median family income ($70,989 compared to $90,543, a difference of 27.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($66,529 compared to $83,682, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $36,408, a difference of 10.2%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $47,380, a difference of 11.8%), and wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 115.3%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 75.5%), and single male poverty (25.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 15.4%), single female poverty (31.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 32.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 84.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 79.0%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 72.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 29.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 34.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 24.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 16.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (73.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 34.8%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.0%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.4%), family households (66.4% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.2%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 40.6%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 36.7%), and associate's degree (32.6% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 31.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 26.6%), and hearing disability (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (14.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.81%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.2%).