Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,086,059 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina corresponds to an increase of 15.9 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,278 compared to $39,104, a difference of 8.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,288 compared to $87,255, a difference of 8.1%), and median family income ($97,432 compared to $90,543, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.95%), householder income over 65 years ($55,986 compared to $53,737, a difference of 4.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,819 compared to $83,682, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 29.9%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 27.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 32.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 26.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.23%), family households (61.9% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.98%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (37.6% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 13.2%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.10%), 8th grade (96.2% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and 7th grade (96.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.8%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.5%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.9%).