Dutch vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,824,665 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Dutch communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.031. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch corresponds to an increase of 1.4 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.6% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 18.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,650 compared to $87,255, a difference of 14.2%), and median family income ($101,192 compared to $90,543, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,339 compared to $36,408, a difference of 2.6%), median earnings ($45,370 compared to $42,430, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,265 compared to $47,380, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 37.1%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 35.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.37%), single male poverty (14.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.6%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.95%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 21.2%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.1%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (64.9% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 60.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.6% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.0%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.2%).