French vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,027,494 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.674. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 32.5 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,824 compared to $87,255, a difference of 14.4%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and median family income ($102,368 compared to $90,543, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,457 compared to $36,408, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,230 compared to $47,380, a difference of 8.1%), and median earnings ($46,296 compared to $42,430, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 29.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 27.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.45%), single father poverty (18.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.2%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.0%), births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 14.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.82%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 47.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.9%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.9%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 16.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.40%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.7%).