Immigrants from Liberia vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Liberia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Liberia

Iroquois

Poor
Fair
1,533
SOCIAL INDEX
12.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
303rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Liberia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,510,278 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.118. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to an increase of 11.6 Iroquois.
Immigrants from Liberia Integration in Iroquois Communities

Immigrants from Liberia vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 22.0%), median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $36,408, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,863 compared to $83,682, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($90,450 compared to $90,543, a difference of 0.10%), householder income over 65 years ($53,967 compared to $53,737, a difference of 0.43%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,739 compared to $87,255, a difference of 0.55%).
Immigrants from Liberia vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LiberiaIroquois
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,165
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,450
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,896
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,923
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,317
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,970
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,981
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,863
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,739
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,967
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.6%
Excellent
25.1%

Immigrants from Liberia vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 15.6%), single female poverty (22.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.85%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.91%).
Immigrants from Liberia vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LiberiaIroquois
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.2%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.2%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.1%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
13.5%

Immigrants from Liberia vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Liberia vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LiberiaIroquois
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Liberia vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Liberia vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LiberiaIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.6%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.5%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.9%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.9%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.7%
Tragic
80.6%

Immigrants from Liberia vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.1%), married-couple households (40.3% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.0% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.35%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Liberia vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LiberiaIroquois
Family Households
Tragic
62.0%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.3%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.8%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.6%
Tragic
38.2%

Immigrants from Liberia vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.6%).
Immigrants from Liberia vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LiberiaIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.2%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.8%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.3%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.1%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Good
6.5%

Immigrants from Liberia vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 31.3%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.24%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.65%).
Immigrants from Liberia vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LiberiaIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Poor
93.3%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.4%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.4%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.3%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.5%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Liberia vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 30.2%), male disability (11.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.76%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from Liberia vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LiberiaIroquois
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%