Immigrants from Cambodia vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,714,358 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.446. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to an increase of 13.1 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,304 compared to $74,279, a difference of 12.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,450 compared to $47,380, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,537 compared to $87,255, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($40,434 compared to $39,104, a difference of 3.4%), median male earnings ($51,594 compared to $49,374, a difference of 4.5%), and median earnings ($45,090 compared to $42,430, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 26.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 22.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.3%), receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 10.8%), births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.5% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 0.48%), married-couple households (44.9% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.71%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 85.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and high school diploma (85.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.030%), associate's degree (42.3% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.1%).