Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Uzbekistan

Iroquois

Fair
Fair
4,141
SOCIAL INDEX
38.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
204th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Uzbekistan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,698,041 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Uzbekistan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.017. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uzbekistan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uzbekistan corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Iroquois.
Immigrants from Uzbekistan Integration in Iroquois Communities

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,929 compared to $39,104, a difference of 20.0%), median female earnings ($43,363 compared to $36,408, a difference of 19.1%), and median earnings ($50,151 compared to $42,430, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,331 compared to $53,737, a difference of 4.8%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and median family income ($103,197 compared to $90,543, a difference of 14.0%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanIroquois
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,929
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Average
$103,197
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Good
$86,425
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,151
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,941
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,363
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,846
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,849
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,523
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,331
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.7%
Excellent
25.1%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 35.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 29.3%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.3%), family poverty (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and male poverty (12.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.5%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanIroquois
Poverty
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Good
17.0%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Poor
17.3%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.1%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
13.5%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 37.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.7%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanIroquois
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.2% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 37.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
29.2%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.4%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
80.6%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.8% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 48.1%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 43.4%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanIroquois
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.4%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
25.8%
Tragic
38.2%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 143.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 78.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 21.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (37.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 44.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 62.2%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
26.7%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
73.4%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
37.9%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.0%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.6%
Good
6.5%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 40.1%), master's degree (17.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 38.5%), and no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.77%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.78%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.0%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.3%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.8%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 71.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 44.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.5%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.9%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanIroquois
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.85%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.2%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.7%