Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Bahamas
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Bahamas

Iroquois

Tragic
Fair
1,107
SOCIAL INDEX
8.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
322nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Bahamas Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,245,257 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Bahamas communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.017. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bahamas within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bahamas corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Iroquois.
Immigrants from Bahamas Integration in Iroquois Communities

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 19.1%), median male earnings ($45,176 compared to $49,374, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,910 compared to $83,682, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,174 compared to $53,737, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,793 compared to $47,380, a difference of 3.5%), and median female earnings ($35,027 compared to $36,408, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BahamasIroquois
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,193
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,732
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Tragic
$71,349
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,861
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,176
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,027
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,793
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,910
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,177
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,174
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Excellent
25.1%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 16.3%), single female poverty (22.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.58%), female poverty (16.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BahamasIroquois
Poverty
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.3%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
13.5%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.72%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.90%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BahamasIroquois
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.4%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BahamasIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.0%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.2%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
80.6%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.7%), divorced or separated (13.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (63.6% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BahamasIroquois
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.7%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.9%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.1%
Tragic
38.2%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.7%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BahamasIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.5%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.3%
Good
6.5%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and college, under 1 year (61.1% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.070%), bachelor's degree (33.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.38%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BahamasIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Poor
97.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.2%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.2%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.3%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.99%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.4%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BahamasIroquois
Disability
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
2.7%