Australian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Australian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Australians

Iroquois

Excellent
Fair
9,058
SOCIAL INDEX
88.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
32nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Australian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,563,118 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.669. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.180% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 179.6 Iroquois.
Australian Integration in Iroquois Communities

Australian vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $39,104, a difference of 33.2%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $90,543, a difference of 30.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,533 compared to $87,255, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 12.4%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $47,380, a difference of 13.4%), and median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $36,408, a difference of 19.0%).
Australian vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricAustralianIroquois
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,074
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$118,440
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,490
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,294
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,857
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,308
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,739
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$107,912
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$113,533
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,891
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Excellent
25.1%

Australian vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 42.0%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 40.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 10.5%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 14.6%).
Australian vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricAustralianIroquois
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
13.5%

Australian vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 21.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
Australian vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAustralianIroquois
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%

Australian vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%).
Australian vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAustralianIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.3%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.8%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.3%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.5%
Tragic
80.6%

Australian vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 29.3%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.82%), family households (62.8% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.3%).
Australian vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAustralianIroquois
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.6%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.5%
Tragic
38.2%

Australian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.92%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.4%).
Australian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAustralianIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Good
6.5%

Australian vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 59.3%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 50.1%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.28%).
Australian vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricAustralianIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.4%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
1.6%

Australian vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 33.4%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 5.4%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.1%).
Australian vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricAustralianIroquois
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Average
11.3%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%