Mexican vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,917,567 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Mexican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.069. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexicans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexicans corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,559 compared to $39,104, a difference of 13.2%), median female earnings ($33,664 compared to $36,408, a difference of 8.2%), and median male earnings ($46,147 compared to $49,374, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($74,399 compared to $74,279, a difference of 0.16%), householder income over 65 years ($53,897 compared to $53,737, a difference of 0.30%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,816 compared to $87,255, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and family poverty (11.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and male unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (31.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 20.4%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.2% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 0.98%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 55.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 75.1%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 36.4%), and professional degree (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.9%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.43%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.0%).