Turkish vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Turkish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Turks

Iroquois

Exceptional
Fair
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Turkish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,790,030 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 4.3 Iroquois.
Turkish Integration in Iroquois Communities

Turkish vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $87,255, a difference of 35.0%), per capita income ($52,391 compared to $39,104, a difference of 34.0%), and median family income ($121,202 compared to $90,543, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 10.4%), householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $47,380, a difference of 14.5%), and median female earnings ($44,695 compared to $36,408, a difference of 22.8%).
Turkish vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricTurkishIroquois
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,391
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$121,202
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$99,389
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,919
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$64,253
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,695
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,266
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$110,318
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,814
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$68,037
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Excellent
25.1%

Turkish vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 53.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 51.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 17.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.1%).
Turkish vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricTurkishIroquois
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.5%

Turkish vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 24.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.98%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.3%).
Turkish vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTurkishIroquois
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%

Turkish vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.3%).
Turkish vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTurkishIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.9%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.7%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Tragic
80.6%

Turkish vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 39.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.7%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.22%), family households (63.6% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.3%).
Turkish vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTurkishIroquois
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
38.2%

Turkish vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.0%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.68%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.4%).
Turkish vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTurkishIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.3%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.4%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Good
6.5%

Turkish vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 67.9%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 66.9%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.070%).
Turkish vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricTurkishIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.5%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.7%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
65.5%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
1.6%

Turkish vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 48.7%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 36.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.1%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.9%).
Turkish vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricTurkishIroquois
Disability
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%