Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,248,854 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.086% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 85.9 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 9.8%), householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $53,737, a difference of 6.3%), and median household income ($78,682 compared to $74,279, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,827 compared to $39,104, a difference of 1.8%), median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $49,374, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $47,380, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 16.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 15.0%), and single female poverty (22.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.5%), family poverty (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.4%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 16.2%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.54%), married-couple households (43.4% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 67.0%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.5% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.24%), college, 1 year or more (56.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 5.9%).