Japanese vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,963,146 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.250. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to an increase of 3.3 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,395 compared to $74,279, a difference of 12.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,834 compared to $87,255, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $47,380, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,870 compared to $39,104, a difference of 2.0%), median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $49,374, a difference of 4.3%), and wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 23.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 22.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.89%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (29.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 13.0%), births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.5% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 0.57%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.0%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 77.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (33.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.5%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.24%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.1%).