New Zealander vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,732,828 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.190% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 190.4 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $39,104, a difference of 29.3%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $74,279, a difference of 28.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $87,255, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 10.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $47,380, a difference of 12.5%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $36,408, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 36.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 33.5%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 5.8%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 25.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.5%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.14%), family households (62.9% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 61.1%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 56.8%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.6%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.3%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 11.3%).