Colville vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,772,435 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Colville communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Colville within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Colville corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Colville and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 17.8%), median household income ($70,094 compared to $74,279, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,474 compared to $87,255, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($42,151 compared to $42,430, a difference of 0.66%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,604 compared to $83,682, a difference of 1.3%), and median male earnings ($48,516 compared to $49,374, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Colville and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 35.2%), single male poverty (18.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.080%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Colville and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (29.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 68.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 53.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Colville and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (59.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Colville and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.6%), births to unmarried women (45.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 18.6%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.69%), and family households (63.2% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Colville and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 72.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 32.5%), and no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Colville and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (29.0% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 14.5%), associate's degree (38.5% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Colville and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (3.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 125.8%), hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 44.6%), and male disability (16.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.44%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.88%), and female disability (15.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 7.3%).