Menominee vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,291,130 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Menominee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.068. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Menominee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Menominee corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Menominee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($42,581 compared to $49,374, a difference of 16.0%), median family income ($79,563 compared to $90,543, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($76,903 compared to $87,255, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,907 compared to $47,380, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($51,719 compared to $53,737, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,358 compared to $83,682, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Menominee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 32.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 27.3%), and receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Menominee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (10.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 117.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 49.9%), and female unemployment (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Menominee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Menominee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 61.9%), births to unmarried women (51.1% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 33.8%), and single mother households (9.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (42.0% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 4.2%), average family size (3.30 compared to 3.16, a difference of 4.6%), and currently married (42.3% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Menominee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 26.5%), bachelor's degree (27.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 21.7%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.9%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.21%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.2%).