Costa Rican vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Costa Rican
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Costa Ricans

Iroquois

Average
Fair
5,399
SOCIAL INDEX
51.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
177th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Costa Rican Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,672,137 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.710. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.182% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 181.6 Iroquois.
Costa Rican Integration in Iroquois Communities

Costa Rican vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,779 compared to $87,255, a difference of 17.8%), median household income ($87,262 compared to $74,279, a difference of 17.5%), and median family income ($103,989 compared to $90,543, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.85%), median female earnings ($39,622 compared to $36,408, a difference of 8.8%), and median earnings ($46,645 compared to $42,430, a difference of 9.9%).
Costa Rican vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricCosta RicanIroquois
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,090
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Good
$103,989
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,262
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Average
$46,645
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,279
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,622
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,106
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,565
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,779
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,638
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Excellent
25.1%

Costa Rican vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 32.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 30.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 9.0%).
Costa Rican vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricCosta RicanIroquois
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Average
9.0%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Good
13.3%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.9%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Good
16.0%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.2%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Average
29.0%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.6%
Tragic
13.5%

Costa Rican vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Costa Rican vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCosta RicanIroquois
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.8%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.5%
Tragic
5.7%

Costa Rican vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Costa Rican vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCosta RicanIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.3%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Tragic
80.6%

Costa Rican vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 16.8%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.1%), currently married (46.5% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (65.9% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 5.9%).
Costa Rican vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCosta RicanIroquois
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.7%
Tragic
38.2%

Costa Rican vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 14.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.4%).
Costa Rican vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCosta RicanIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.5%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.9%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Good
6.5%

Costa Rican vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.0%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 17.0%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.37%).
Costa Rican vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricCosta RicanIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.4%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.4%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.7%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Average
15.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Average
4.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.6%

Costa Rican vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 33.7%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.8%).
Costa Rican vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricCosta RicanIroquois
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.6%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.9%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%