Immigrants from Ecuador vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Ecuador

Iroquois

Poor
Fair
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,142,619 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.389. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 28.7 Iroquois.
Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Iroquois Communities

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $47,380, a difference of 13.4%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 11.5%), and median household income ($80,341 compared to $74,279, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $53,737, a difference of 0.54%), median male earnings ($50,474 compared to $49,374, a difference of 2.2%), and median family income ($92,837 compared to $90,543, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricImmigrants from EcuadorIroquois
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,195
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,837
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,341
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,462
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,474
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,644
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,722
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,673
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,462
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,030
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.5%
Excellent
25.1%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and poverty (14.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from EcuadorIroquois
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.7%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
13.5%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 19.0%), and female unemployment (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.4%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from EcuadorIroquois
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.9%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 28.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from EcuadorIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
80.6%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 13.2%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (42.9% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 2.1%), currently married (43.2% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (64.8% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from EcuadorIroquois
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.9%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.7%
Tragic
38.2%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 117.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 52.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 17.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 35.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 45.1%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.8%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.2%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.5%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.4%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.2%
Good
6.5%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and college, under 1 year (58.7% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from EcuadorIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.1%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.8%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.7%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.2%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.7%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 49.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.7%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorIroquois
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%