Tohono O'odham vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Iroquois
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,008,903 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.199. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 8.0 Iroquois.
Tohono O'odham vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $39,104, a difference of 29.2%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $90,543, a difference of 25.4%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $49,374, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $47,380, a difference of 4.7%), householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $53,737, a difference of 9.4%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $36,408, a difference of 9.6%).
Income Metric | Tohono O'odham | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,256 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $72,193 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $61,663 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,349 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $39,543 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,205 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,248 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $69,068 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,774 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,121 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.1% | Excellent 25.1% |
Tohono O'odham vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 103.8%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 90.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 74.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 23.5%), single father poverty (22.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 24.1%), and single female poverty (34.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 32.9%).
Poverty Metric | Tohono O'odham | Iroquois |
Poverty | Tragic 24.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 24.7% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 29.5% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 31.7% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 34.2% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.0% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.2% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Tohono O'odham vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 92.1%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 78.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Tohono O'odham | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.9% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Tragic 7.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.1% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 9.3% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Tohono O'odham vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 27.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 8.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tohono O'odham | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.2% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 70.4% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.3% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 68.6% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 77.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.1% | Tragic 80.6% |
Tohono O'odham vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 46.8%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 31.1%), and births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.1%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and family households (67.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 7.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Tohono O'odham | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 37.9% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.53 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 36.8% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 49.8% | Tragic 38.2% |
Tohono O'odham vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 42.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 5.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.7% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.0% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Good 6.5% |
Tohono O'odham vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 36.0%), associate's degree (31.8% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 34.7%), and master's degree (9.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.30%).
Education Level Metric | Tohono O'odham | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.6% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.7% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.1% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.8% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 47.1% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.4% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Tohono O'odham vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 41.6%), and ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 5.7%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.1%).
Disability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 36.0% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.7% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.7% |