Tlingit-Haida vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Iroquois
5,201
SOCIAL INDEX
49.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
182nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Tlingit-Haida Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,857,485 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.006. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tlingit-Haida within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tlingit-Haida corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Iroquois.
Tlingit-Haida vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,914 compared to $47,380, a difference of 18.0%), householder income over 65 years ($62,922 compared to $53,737, a difference of 17.1%), and median household income ($83,968 compared to $74,279, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 4.7%), median male earnings ($52,409 compared to $49,374, a difference of 6.1%), and median earnings ($45,468 compared to $42,430, a difference of 7.2%).
Income Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,516 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,092 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,968 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,468 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,409 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,513 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,914 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,987 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $97,417 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,922 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.0% | Excellent 25.1% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 44.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 42.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 4.2%), single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 15.6%).
Poverty Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Iroquois |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Good 10.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.8% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.9% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (20.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 122.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 37.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.6% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.5% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.3% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.5% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.9% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.5% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.9% | Tragic 80.6% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.2%), births to unmarried women (32.2% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 18.6%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.080%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and family households (61.6% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Iroquois |
Family Households | Tragic 61.6% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.1% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.2% | Tragic 38.2% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.96%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.8% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.9% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Good 6.5% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.7%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.43%), associate's degree (43.0% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.55%).
Education Level Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.0% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.4% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.0% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.9% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.6% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Tragic 1.6% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (13.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 2.0%), disability (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.6% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |