Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Iroquois
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Middle Africa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,415,655 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 6.1 Iroquois.
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 12.1%), householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $53,737, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,293 compared to $87,255, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,201 compared to $49,374, a difference of 0.35%), per capita income ($39,529 compared to $39,104, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $47,380, a difference of 1.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,529 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $93,593 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $77,559 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,416 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,201 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,965 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,916 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,254 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,293 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,375 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.4% | Excellent 25.1% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 17.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 16.0%), and single female poverty (22.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Iroquois |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.1% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.3% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.68%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.6% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.1% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.7% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.6% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 80.6% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.9%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.9% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.57%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Iroquois |
Family Households | Tragic 61.9% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.0% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.9% | Tragic 38.2% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.7%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.74%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.4% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Good 6.5% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.7%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.5%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.56%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.9% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.6% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.4% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 63.9% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 58.0% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Poor 44.7% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.6% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 33.9%), male disability (11.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 22.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 5.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Iroquois |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.1% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.1% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |