Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Middle Africa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Middle Africa

Iroquois

Fair
Fair
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Middle Africa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,415,655 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 6.1 Iroquois.
Immigrants from Middle Africa Integration in Iroquois Communities

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 12.1%), householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $53,737, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,293 compared to $87,255, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,201 compared to $49,374, a difference of 0.35%), per capita income ($39,529 compared to $39,104, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $47,380, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaIroquois
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,529
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Tragic
$93,593
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Tragic
$77,559
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,416
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,201
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,965
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,916
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,254
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,293
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,375
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.4%
Excellent
25.1%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 17.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 16.0%), and single female poverty (22.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaIroquois
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.3%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.5%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.68%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaIroquois
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.1%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.7%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.6%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
80.6%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.9%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.9% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.57%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaIroquois
Family Households
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.8%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.9%
Tragic
38.2%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.7%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.74%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.6%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
89.9%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.4%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Good
6.5%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.7%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.5%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.56%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.9%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.4%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
58.0%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.7%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.6%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 33.9%), male disability (11.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 22.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 5.5%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaIroquois
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.1%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%