Creek vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,054,397 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.060. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 4.2 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $83,682, a difference of 11.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $87,255, a difference of 10.5%), and per capita income ($35,546 compared to $39,104, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $53,737, a difference of 3.4%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $47,380, a difference of 4.4%), and median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $49,374, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 21.2%), single male poverty (16.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 16.3%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother poverty (36.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.0%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and married-couple households (45.3% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.050%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.88%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 40.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 22.7%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 19.4%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.030%), 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.9%), ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 19.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.24%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.5%).