Immigrants from Cuba vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Cuba
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Cuba

Iroquois

Fair
Fair
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Cuba Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,677,419 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.538. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Iroquois.
Immigrants from Cuba Integration in Iroquois Communities

Immigrants from Cuba vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $53,737, a difference of 20.1%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $90,543, a difference of 15.7%), and median male earnings ($43,461 compared to $49,374, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $47,380, a difference of 6.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,662 compared to $87,255, a difference of 8.2%), and median household income ($68,461 compared to $74,279, a difference of 8.5%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CubaIroquois
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$34,910
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Tragic
$78,249
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Tragic
$68,461
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,426
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$43,461
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,291
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,374
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,701
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$80,662
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$44,735
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.4%
Excellent
25.1%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 53.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 50.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), female poverty (16.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CubaIroquois
Poverty
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Tragic
11.3%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Average
16.4%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.1%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.5%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
13.5%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 33.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.7%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CubaIroquois
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.6%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 32.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CubaIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.0%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.2%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
80.6%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 18.4%), family households (68.2% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.2% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 1.0%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (43.7% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CubaIroquois
Family Households
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.2%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.26
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.5%
Tragic
38.2%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 25.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.7%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CubaIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.3%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Good
6.5%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 49.8%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.7%), and master's degree (10.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CubaIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.2%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.9%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.5%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.2%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
55.7%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.7%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.5%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.2%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 48.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 47.4%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.6%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.7%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CubaIroquois
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Fair
12.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.7%