Tsimshian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tsimshian

Iroquois

Average
Fair
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Tsimshian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,979,670 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.343. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to a decrease of 19.1 Iroquois.
Tsimshian Integration in Iroquois Communities

Tsimshian vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $83,682, a difference of 16.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $47,380, a difference of 15.3%), and median household income ($83,346 compared to $74,279, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $49,374, a difference of 1.1%), median earnings ($43,695 compared to $42,430, a difference of 3.0%), and per capita income ($40,344 compared to $39,104, a difference of 3.2%).
Tsimshian vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricTsimshianIroquois
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,344
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,543
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,346
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,695
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,836
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,530
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,649
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,809
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,783
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,202
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.9%
Excellent
25.1%

Tsimshian vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 78.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 49.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 8.1%).
Tsimshian vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricTsimshianIroquois
Poverty
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Good
8.8%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Good
13.1%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.8%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
13.5%

Tsimshian vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 133.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 78.8%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Tsimshian vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTsimshianIroquois
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Tragic
5.7%

Tsimshian vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Tsimshian vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTsimshianIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
88.7%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Tragic
80.6%

Tsimshian vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.9%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.9%), divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.8%).
Tsimshian vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTsimshianIroquois
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.7%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.2%
Tragic
38.2%

Tsimshian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 27.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.6%).
Tsimshian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTsimshianIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Good
6.5%

Tsimshian vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.2%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.72%).
Tsimshian vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricTsimshianIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.6%

Tsimshian vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 65.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (32.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and hearing disability (4.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.0%).
Tsimshian vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricTsimshianIroquois
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.9%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
59.2%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%