Immigrants from Micronesia vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Iroquois
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Micronesia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,578,351 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Iroquois.
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $53,737, a difference of 13.5%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $47,380, a difference of 7.0%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $49,374, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($90,345 compared to $90,543, a difference of 0.22%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,864 compared to $87,255, a difference of 0.70%), and median household income ($75,574 compared to $74,279, a difference of 1.7%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,464 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,345 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,574 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,133 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,177 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,477 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,691 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,544 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,864 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,000 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.4% | Excellent 25.1% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.30%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.8%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Iroquois |
Poverty | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.0% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.76%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Average 8.9% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.59%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.9% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.8% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.1% | Tragic 80.6% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 16.2%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.16, a difference of 5.1%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.3%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Iroquois |
Family Households | Average 64.2% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.2% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.9% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 32.9% | Tragic 38.2% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.1%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.76%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.99%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.1% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.7% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Good 6.5% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 19.8%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.6%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.080%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.6% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.5% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.8% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.2% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.53%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.67%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.1% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.7% |