Cambodian vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cambodian
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cambodians
Iroquois
9,346
SOCIAL INDEX
90.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
19th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Cambodian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,042,624 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Cambodian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.529. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cambodians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.219% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cambodians corresponds to an increase of 218.9 Iroquois.
Cambodian vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,731 compared to $39,104, a difference of 32.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,342 compared to $87,255, a difference of 31.0%), and median family income ($117,780 compared to $90,543, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($55,571 compared to $47,380, a difference of 17.3%), and median female earnings ($45,014 compared to $36,408, a difference of 23.6%).
Income Metric | Cambodian | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,731 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $117,780 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $96,324 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,386 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,516 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $45,014 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,571 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $107,148 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $114,342 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,892 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.8% | Excellent 25.1% |
Cambodian vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 52.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 49.3%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 8.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 16.3%).
Poverty Metric | Cambodian | Iroquois |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.4% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Cambodian vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 48.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 28.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Cambodian | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.5% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Cambodian vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cambodian | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.4% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.1% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 37.0% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 80.6% |
Cambodian vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 43.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.1%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.14%), family households (61.4% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Cambodian | Iroquois |
Family Households | Tragic 61.4% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.5% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.7% | Tragic 38.2% |
Cambodian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cambodian | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.3% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Good 6.5% |
Cambodian vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 61.4%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 60.8%), and master's degree (20.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.030%).
Education Level Metric | Cambodian | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.2% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.9% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.7% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 54.6% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 47.2% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.6% |
Cambodian vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 46.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.4%), and male disability (10.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 16.9%).
Disability Metric | Cambodian | Iroquois |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.3% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.7% |