Immigrants from Chile vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Iroquois
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,101,273 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.881. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.070% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 70.0 Iroquois.
Immigrants from Chile vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($88,388 compared to $74,279, a difference of 19.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $87,255, a difference of 18.5%), and per capita income ($46,213 compared to $39,104, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $47,380, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $36,408, a difference of 10.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,213 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,655 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $88,388 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,697 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $55,954 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,353 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,440 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,159 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,412 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,354 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.7% | Excellent 25.1% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 33.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 33.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 5.7%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Iroquois |
Poverty | Average 12.2% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Average 8.9% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.4% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.7% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.1% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Average 5.2% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.1% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 80.6% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 22.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.7%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.5%), family households (64.6% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Iroquois |
Family Households | Good 64.6% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.7% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.5% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 31.2% | Tragic 38.2% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.15%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.86%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.1% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.2% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.1% | Good 6.5% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.5%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.8%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.4% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.2% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.9% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.9% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.8% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.4% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.0% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.8% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 41.8%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.2%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.3%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Iroquois |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |