South American vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
South American
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
South Americans
Iroquois
5,097
SOCIAL INDEX
48.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
186th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in South American Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,438,445 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within South American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Americans corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Iroquois.
South American vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between South American and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($86,824 compared to $74,279, a difference of 16.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,837 compared to $87,255, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,362 compared to $83,682, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.16%), median female earnings ($39,698 compared to $36,408, a difference of 9.0%), and median earnings ($46,804 compared to $42,430, a difference of 10.3%).
Income Metric | South American | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,114 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,856 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,824 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Good $46,804 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,492 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,698 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,939 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,362 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $100,837 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $59,854 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Excellent 25.1% |
South American vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 32.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 31.5%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.94%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Poverty Metric | South American | Iroquois |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Fair 9.3% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Average 13.5% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.0% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.7% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.0% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.3% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Excellent 16.0% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.6% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
South American vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Unemployment Metric | South American | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Tragic 5.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.3% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.6% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.5% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
South American vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 18.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | South American | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.6% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.5% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 80.6% |
South American vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 20.3%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.1% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 3.2%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Family Structure Metric | South American | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.6% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.27 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.1% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.8% | Tragic 38.2% |
South American vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.38%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | South American | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.5% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.5% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.9% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.6% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Good 6.5% |
South American vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.0%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.7%), and master's degree (15.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.56%).
Education Level Metric | South American | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.8% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.6% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.8% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.2% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 59.0% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.1% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.9% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Excellent 15.6% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.6% |
South American vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 45.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 38.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.6%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.5%).
Disability Metric | South American | Iroquois |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |