British vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
British
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
British
Iroquois
8,012
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
92nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in British Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,979,686 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within British communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.716. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.122% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British corresponds to an increase of 121.6 Iroquois.
British vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between British and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,264 compared to $87,255, a difference of 21.8%), median family income ($108,705 compared to $90,543, a difference of 20.1%), and median household income ($88,914 compared to $74,279, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,477 compared to $47,380, a difference of 8.6%), median female earnings ($39,772 compared to $36,408, a difference of 9.2%), and median earnings ($48,189 compared to $42,430, a difference of 13.6%).
Income Metric | British | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,571 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,705 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $88,914 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,189 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,890 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,772 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,477 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $98,359 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,264 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,940 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.9% | Excellent 25.1% |
British vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 39.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 36.0%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.6%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 11.1%).
Poverty Metric | British | Iroquois |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.4% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.3% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Average 21.1% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.2% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
British vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.4%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | British | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.6% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Average 8.9% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
British vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | British | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.5% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.7% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.6% | Tragic 80.6% |
British vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 24.0%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.77%), family households (64.4% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Family Structure Metric | British | Iroquois |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.8% | Tragic 38.2% |
British vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 44.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | British | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.5% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.0% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.9% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.2% | Good 6.5% |
British vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between British and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 36.2%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.7%), and master's degree (16.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.38%).
Education Level Metric | British | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.3% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.8% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.5% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.3% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.9% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.4% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.6% |
British vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between British and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 23.4%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 6.5%).
Disability Metric | British | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |