Immigrants from Laos vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Laos
Iroquois
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,987,370 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 6.6 Iroquois.
Immigrants from Laos vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $47,380, a difference of 5.6%), householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $53,737, a difference of 5.6%), and median household income ($78,327 compared to $74,279, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $49,374, a difference of 0.37%), median earnings ($42,884 compared to $42,430, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $36,408, a difference of 1.2%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,857 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $92,239 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $78,327 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,884 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,190 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,841 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,041 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $85,553 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,909 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,722 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.8% | Excellent 25.1% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 17.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Iroquois |
Poverty | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.1% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.6% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 80.6% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (29.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 14.5%), births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 0.70%), married-couple households (45.1% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.1% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.0% | Tragic 38.2% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 34.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 15.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.8% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.4% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Good 6.5% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 67.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 16.1%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.5% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.9% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.6% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.7% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.3% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.7% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.2%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.57%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.7% |