Iroquois vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
White/Caucasian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Whites/Caucasians
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
White/Caucasian Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,308,358 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.651. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.952% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 952.1 Whites/Caucasians.
Iroquois vs White/Caucasian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 13.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $98,091, a difference of 12.4%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $82,029, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $37,531, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $50,336, a difference of 6.2%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $45,197, a difference of 6.5%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | White/Caucasian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Poor $42,180 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Poor $99,800 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Poor $82,029 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Poor $45,197 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Fair $53,925 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Tragic $37,531 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Tragic $50,336 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Poor $91,668 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Fair $98,091 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Tragic $58,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Tragic 28.5% |
Iroquois vs White/Caucasian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 23.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 22.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.0%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.5%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | White/Caucasian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Poor 18.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Average 16.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Average 16.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 18.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Excellent 11.1% |
Iroquois vs White/Caucasian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.0%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.86%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | White/Caucasian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Poor 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Iroquois vs White/Caucasian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.63%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | White/Caucasian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 78.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
Iroquois vs White/Caucasian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 14.9%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.44%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (62.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 4.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | White/Caucasian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Exceptional 65.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Poor 33.3% |
Iroquois vs White/Caucasian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 55.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 11.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | White/Caucasian |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Exceptional 7.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 93.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Exceptional 60.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Iroquois vs White/Caucasian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.28%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | White/Caucasian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 93.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Exceptional 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Exceptional 90.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Good 86.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Poor 64.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 57.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Tragic 44.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 35.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Fair 1.8% |
Iroquois vs White/Caucasian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 14.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | White/Caucasian |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 13.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Average 47.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |