Iroquois vs Immigrants from Sierra Leone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,806,758 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sierra Leone within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.950. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.530% in Immigrants from Sierra Leone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 2,530.2 Immigrants from Sierra Leone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $66,009, a difference of 22.8%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $88,498, a difference of 19.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $103,227, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $53,905, a difference of 9.2%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $42,752, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $93,115, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (25.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 32.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 31.7%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.2%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 22.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 12.5%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 11.6%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.7% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 0.99%), currently married (44.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (62.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.59%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 31.0%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 26.4%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.52%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 45.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 30.4%), and male disability (13.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.7%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 8.8%).