Iroquois vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,773,139 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.970. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.071% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 70.7 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $43,997, a difference of 12.5%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $82,560, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $52,302, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $56,975, a difference of 6.0%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $38,945, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 27.3%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 25.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 2.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 24.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 12.7%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.59%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.4%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 38.7%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 4.3%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.3%).