Iroquois vs Nonimmigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,308,712 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.492. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.151% in Nonimmigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 150.6 Nonimmigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 8.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $94,448, a difference of 8.2%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $79,429, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $37,024, a difference of 1.7%), median earnings ($42,430 compared to $44,117, a difference of 4.0%), and per capita income ($39,104 compared to $40,669, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 14.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.60%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.92%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 0.75%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 7.5%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.86%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.92%), and family households (62.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 38.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 5.5%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and high school diploma (89.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 10.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.82%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.7%).