Iroquois vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,259,989 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 54.9 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ute communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 10.8%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $36,651, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $49,997, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $48,899, a difference of 0.97%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $52,949, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $82,166, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (13.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 22.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and poverty (14.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 37.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 34.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ute communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 15.8%), single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.49, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.7% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 35.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.56%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.2%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and associate's degree (42.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 69.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.2%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.2%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 7.2%).