Iroquois vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,660,877 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 21.2 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $103,472, a difference of 18.6%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $87,557, a difference of 17.9%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $106,541, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $50,923, a difference of 7.5%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $55,290, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 30.6%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 23.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 30.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 27.0%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 0.23%), family households (62.2% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.38%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.4%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 38.4%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.8%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 28.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.89%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.8%).