Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Immigrants from Panama
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Immigrants from Panama
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,936
SOCIAL INDEX
16.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
282nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Panama Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,202,265 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.173% in Immigrants from Panama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 172.7 Immigrants from Panama.
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $80,873, a difference of 8.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,278, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $93,815, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $51,962, a difference of 5.2%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $95,647, a difference of 5.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $56,944, a difference of 6.0%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Panama |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Poor $41,853 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Tragic $95,647 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Tragic $80,873 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Poor $45,198 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Tragic $51,962 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Fair $39,049 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Tragic $51,278 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Tragic $89,451 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Tragic $93,815 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Tragic $56,944 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Exceptional 23.4% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.8%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.57%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.1%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Panama |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 13.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 10.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Poor 14.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 17.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 17.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 17.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Poor 29.8% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.6% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Panama |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 19.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 17.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Panama |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Average 65.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Tragic 34.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Tragic 73.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 82.2% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 11.7%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 0.32%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Panama |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Average 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Tragic 44.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Tragic 34.2% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 33.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 9.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Panama |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Tragic 14.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Tragic 85.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Tragic 51.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Tragic 17.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.8%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.43%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Panama |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 95.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Tragic 88.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 84.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 63.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 57.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Poor 44.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Poor 36.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Fair 14.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.6% |
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.1%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.0%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Immigrants from Panama |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Poor 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Poor 11.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Fair 11.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 24.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Poor 17.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |