Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Panama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Immigrants from Panama

Fair
Poor
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,936
SOCIAL INDEX
16.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
282nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Panama Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,202,265 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.173% in Immigrants from Panama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 172.7 Immigrants from Panama.
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Panama Communities

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $80,873, a difference of 8.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,278, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $93,815, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $51,962, a difference of 5.2%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $95,647, a difference of 5.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $56,944, a difference of 6.0%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Income
Income MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Panama
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Poor
$41,853
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Tragic
$95,647
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Tragic
$80,873
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Poor
$45,198
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Tragic
$51,962
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Fair
$39,049
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Tragic
$51,278
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Tragic
$89,451
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Tragic
$93,815
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Tragic
$56,944
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
23.4%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.8%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.57%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.1%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Panama
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.0%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
17.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
17.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
17.9%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Poor
29.8%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
12.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
13.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.6%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Panama
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
19.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 17.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Panama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Tragic
34.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
73.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
82.2%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 11.7%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 0.32%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Panama
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Tragic
44.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Tragic
34.2%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 33.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 9.7%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Panama
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Tragic
14.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Tragic
85.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Tragic
51.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Tragic
17.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
5.7%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.8%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.43%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Panama
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Tragic
88.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
84.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
63.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Tragic
57.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Poor
44.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Poor
36.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Fair
14.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.6%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.1%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.0%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Panama Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Panama
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Poor
11.5%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Fair
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%