Iroquois vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,672,137 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.714. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.176% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 175.7 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $102,779, a difference of 17.8%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $87,262, a difference of 17.5%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $103,989, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.85%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $39,622, a difference of 8.8%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $46,645, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 32.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 30.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 16.8%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.9%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.1%), currently married (44.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (62.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 14.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.0%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 33.7%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.8%).