Iroquois vs Kiowa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,290,735 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Kiowa within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.383. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Kiowa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 7.5 Kiowa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $74,815, a difference of 16.6%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $65,914, a difference of 12.7%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $80,885, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $51,140, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $44,733, a difference of 5.9%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 27.4%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 26.7%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 1.8%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 43.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 12.9%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 12.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.27, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.37%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 19.9%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.1%), and associate's degree (42.8% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 27.9%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 24.7%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.9%).