Iroquois vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ghana
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Immigrants from Ghana

Fair
Poor
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,709
SOCIAL INDEX
14.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
290th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ghana Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,604,914 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 5.1 Immigrants from Ghana.
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Ghana Communities

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Ghana Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 12.4%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $81,489, a difference of 9.7%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $39,894, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $87,760, a difference of 4.9%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $51,836, a difference of 5.0%), and per capita income ($39,104 compared to $41,131, a difference of 5.2%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Ghana Income
Income MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Ghana
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Tragic
$41,131
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Tragic
$96,544
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Tragic
$81,489
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Fair
$45,641
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Tragic
$51,836
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Good
$39,894
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Poor
$51,333
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Tragic
$87,760
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Tragic
$94,982
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Tragic
$58,624
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
22.3%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Ghana Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 18.5%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 17.4%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.86%), family poverty (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Ghana Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Ghana
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
19.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
12.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
14.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.1%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Ghana Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.2%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Ghana Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Ghana
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.2%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Ghana Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Ghana Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Ghana
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Tragic
35.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Good
82.9%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.7%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.1%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 4.7%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Ghana
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Tragic
42.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Tragic
34.5%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Ghana Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 51.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 20.3%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Ghana Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Ghana
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Tragic
16.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Tragic
83.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Tragic
47.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Tragic
16.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
5.2%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Ghana Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 38.4%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 16.2%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.70%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Ghana Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Ghana
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
89.7%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Tragic
87.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
63.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Tragic
57.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Poor
44.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Fair
36.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Average
15.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Fair
1.8%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Ghana Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 43.9%), male disability (13.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 24.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 3.8%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Ghana Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Ghana
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
24.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Poor
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Poor
2.5%