Iroquois vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,017,842 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.017. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $117,750, a difference of 34.9%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $100,151, a difference of 34.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $72,288, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.6%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $43,648, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $57,078, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 64.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 60.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 18.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 26.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 37.0%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households (62.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 47.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 45.3%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 45.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 40.7%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.8%).